In a conference with delegates from nations bordering the Persian Gulf, senior U.S. government official Antony Blinken outlined two potential paths for the Middle East.
Blinken outlined a route that is characterized by conflict and bloodshed. This strategy breeds discord and unrest, which breeds instability and devastation. He gave the recent Iranian attack on Israel as an example, pointing out that Iran destabilized the area by firing over 300 rockets and missiles at Israel.
Blinken also suggested a route of harmony and collaboration. By encouraging cooperation between Middle Eastern nations, this path promotes security and stability. He underlined that the majority of nations favor this peaceful route, citing humanitarian initiatives in Gaza as a step in the right direction.
Blinken emphasized that the Middle East has to decide between these two options: the peaceable, productive route or the disastrous road of conflict. While the path of peace offers the possibility of stability, the path of conflict may result in more violence. The dangers of carrying on down the path of conflict are brought to light by the Houthi's recent attacks in the Red Sea.
Gulf leaders agreed at the summit that the Middle East should follow the peaceful route and agreed with Blinken's vision. They demanded peace between Israelis and Palestinians as well as an end to hostilities in Gaza.